RunsLab run · 10 November 2026, 15:42 UTC
Rollback on trading health
When an upgrade quietly stops a product serving the trading that relies on it, is it rolled back, and is an upgrade that changes nothing for them left alone?
7/7 passed23 min
Setup
- Chains
- Satsuma lab chain
- RoleHome
- KeptLab, not retained
- RoleProving
- KeptLab, not retained
- Users
- UsersSynthetic
- Model
- No model: scripted answers
- ModeScripted
- Operator seat
- SeatBy delegate
- Unattended
- Yes: nobody was watching to step in
- Time
- 23 min · ended 16:05 UTC
Checklist 7 items
Every item, unless its row says otherwise
- ChainLab
- UsersSynthetic
- DecisionsScripted
Rolling back a bad change
6/6 passed
Pass6 items passedShow them
Fixing by an in-place upgrade
1/1 passed
What this proves
- Whether, in this run, the bad upgrade was rolled back from the trading records and the sound one was kept.
What it does not
- The model's own judgment: model answers are scripted.
What broke, what was fixed
The record of this run does not say whether a person stepped in, so it does not count as a run without repairs.
Cost in tokens
Not recorded: this run has no chain-derived scorecard.
Archived evidence
The lab chains this run used were reset afterwards and are not retained, so nothing here links to an explorer. The record below is the archived copy.
- Scorecard
- None archived.